Student Radar

Record evidence. Review progress. Inform the next step.

School Assessment and Pupil Progress Tracking

Keep assessment entry, analysis and reporting close to the pupils and curriculum they describe. Explore EYFS and small-steps workflows alongside the school-wide assessment picture, with teachers interpreting the evidence.

Request a demoWatch a product example
Follow the product example

One platform. Everything included.

Share context and move from signal to action without buying separate modules.

£4.25 per pupil/year, £250 minimum/year, excluding VAT

Capture assessment evidence in a flexible class workflow while the work is still current.
  1. 01Flexible entry for different phases, subjects, and assessment models
  2. 02Analysis that keeps cohort and pupil context close to the result
  3. 03Connected reporting for teachers, leaders, families, and review meetings

The strongest fit

Best fit

Schools that want flexible assessment workflows connected to classes, pupils, SEND context, family reporting, and leadership review.

A clear boundary

Where this is not the right tool

  • 01Replacing teacher judgement with an automated attainment decision
  • 02Forcing every subject, phase, or curriculum into one fixed assessment model

Evidence before assertion

Find the assessment workflow for your setting

See how evidence is entered, reviewed and reported. Use the phase-specific examples and practical guides to assess how the workflow fits your assessment approach.

Assessment entryExplore the entry workflow and the evidence staff record.Small-steps assessmentSee how small-step progress is recorded and reviewed.EYFS assessmentExplore early-years evidence and the next-step workflow.Assessment reportsSee how staff bring assessment evidence into reporting.Choosing EYFS evidenceWork through an example of evidence informing a teaching decision.Plan an assessment calendarUse a practical approach to the purpose and timing of assessment.

A guided product example

Work through assessment entry, analysis and reporting

Begin with a class, subject and assessment period. Check the model and completeness of the evidence before interpreting a pattern or choosing a report.

The notes explain what each screen shows and what to check in your own walkthrough.

  1. Step 1

    Choose the model and enter a judgement

    Check the class, term and subject before recording the teacher’s judgement. The pictured Reading marksheet offers WTS, EXS and GDS alongside scores; confirm the definitions and subject setup for your school.

    Explore assessment entry
    A completed Reading marksheet using the school’s configured judgement scale.

  2. Step 2

    Choose the analysis that matches the evidence

    For question-level analysis, use a question set and its scores. This is a separate evidence input from a teacher-judgement marksheet; check the subject, period and pupil group before interpreting the results.

    Explore assessment analysis
    The populated question set shows a 72% average and algebraic reasoning as the lowest-scoring strand.

  3. Step 3

    Select a report for the review conversation

    Match the report to the question: current attainment, change over time or differences between cohorts. Inspect the underlying evidence and missing records alongside any headline.

    Explore assessment reports
    The leadership report brings four subject areas across five year groups into one review.

Reading the assessment screens

  • The Reading marksheet contains 864 completed judgements.
  • Question-level analysis shows a 72% average; algebraic reasoning is at 54% across 173 pupils.
  • The leadership report includes 864 pupils across five year groups, with 76.4% at the expected standard across subject judgements.

These views use different assessment inputs and denominators. Teachers explain the evidence behind each judgement; compare the selected subjects, periods and cohorts before deciding what to reteach or review.

Ask to see the complete workflow

  • Record and correct a judgement in your school’s scale, then show its report.
  • Show a populated analysis with its denominator, filters and missing evidence.
  • Check the required phase, curriculum, import format and report before agreeing scope.

Which assessment approach are you evaluating?

  • Teacher judgement: confirm your school’s scale, subject setup and the evidence staff use to make each judgement.
  • EYFS: explore the dedicated observation, checkpoint and family-reporting workflows.
  • Small steps: explore the dedicated progress workflow where an age-related model is not appropriate.
  • Secondary and exam workflows: confirm the required subjects, grading scales, exam windows and outputs in your walkthrough.

Connected school work

Built for the way schools actually work

Schools searching for “school assessment tracking software” usually need clarity, prioritisation, and a way to move from insight to action without adding another spreadsheet.

Operational outcomes this workflow is designed to support

  1. 01

    Less repeated handling between marksheets, analysis, and reporting

  2. 02

    Earlier visibility of gaps, patterns, and pupils needing a closer look

  3. 03

    A clearer evidence trail from classroom judgement to leadership review

Product intent only; these are not presented as verified customer outcome claims.

What this is designed for

Assessment entry and analysis use the same pupil and curriculum context

EYFS, small steps, and exam windows have dedicated workflows

Reports support professional interpretation rather than replacing it

How it works in practice

01

Capture evidence in the right model

Configure assessment around the phase, subject, and curriculum approach rather than forcing every teacher into the same grid.

  • Class and pupil entry
  • Flexible scales and curriculum structures
  • Current context beside the assessment record
02

See the pattern and the pupil behind it

Review groups, gaps, and change over time, then move into the pupil evidence that explains the headline.

  • Cohort and group analysis
  • Attainment and progress views
  • Role-aware links to wider pupil context
03

Report without rebuilding the data

Use the same assessment evidence for teacher review, leadership oversight, family reporting, and next-step planning.

  • Teacher and leadership reports
  • EYFS family reporting
  • Evidence connected to actions and review

Workflow differences worth reviewing

Use these product capability descriptions as a procurement checklist against the tools and processes you already use.

Compared with assessment spreadsheets

  • Keeps pupils, classes, curriculum, analysis, and reports connected
  • Reduces copied formulas and competing versions
  • Moves from a pattern into the underlying evidence without a new export

Compared with a fixed marksheet

  • Supports distinct phase and curriculum workflows
  • Includes EYFS, small steps, and exam assessment windows
  • Keeps interpretation and judgement with teachers and leaders

Related features

Assessment EntryCapture evidence in flexible class and pupil workflows.Open workflow Assessment AnalysisExplore patterns by pupil, class, cohort, and group.Open workflow Assessment ReportsUse current evidence for reporting and review conversations.Open workflow EYFS AssessmentKeep observations, checkpoints, and professional judgement together.Open workflow

Related use cases

School LeadersConnect assessment evidence to whole-school oversight and action.Open workflow

Next step

See how the connected workflow fits your school

We can walk through the route your team would use from the first signal through to action and review.

Request a demoWatch a product example

The practical questions

FAQs

01

Can schools use different assessment models?

Yes. Assessment workflows can support different phases, subjects, scales, and curriculum structures rather than forcing one model across the school.

02

Does it support EYFS assessment?

Yes. Dedicated EYFS workflows support observations, checkpoints, moderation, statutory views, and family reporting while practitioner judgement remains central.

03

Can it track small-steps progress?

Yes. Small Steps provides a dedicated route for recording and reviewing progress where a conventional age-related model is not appropriate.

04

Does it replace teacher judgement?

No. Student Radar organises evidence, analysis, and reporting. Teachers and leaders remain responsible for interpretation and every assessment decision.

05

Can assessment connect to SEND and wider pupil context?

Relevant authorised context can be reached through the connected pupil workflow, helping staff review progress alongside plans and support without opening unrestricted sensitive detail.