Student Radar
Back to Lead

Everything included: £4.25 per pupil/year, £250 minimum/year, excluding VAT

Lead / School Improvement

Priorities with owners, actions with dates, and the gaps in plain sight.

Priorities with owners and review points, the actions and evidence beneath them, and the links through to the SEF and inspection preparation.

Student Radar organises evidence for leadership review. Leaders retain responsibility for evaluation, assurance and decisions.

School Improvement in action. Priorities with owners and review points, the actions and evidence beneath them, and the links through to the SEF and inspection preparation.

From evidence to improvement

The plan as it stands, gaps included

An improvement plan is only useful while it is true. This one shows its own gaps.

  1. 01

    Set the priorities

    Each priority carries its owner, its schedule and its review point, and shows plainly when any of those is missing.

  2. 02

    Work the actions and evidence

    Actions sit under the priority with their dates, overdue when overdue, and evidence linked where the school has added it.

  3. 03

    Review, and feed the SEF

    Review points bring the priority back to a person, and the plan's state feeds the SEF and inspection preparation.

Every capability has a purpose

Inside School Improvement

Each capability solves a distinct problem for pupils and staff. Explore the part your team needs and the work it supports.

01 / 03

School Priorities

Turn improvement priorities into owned, reviewable work connected to the evidence behind each decision.

Part of the School Improvement workflow

02 / 03

Self-Evaluation (SEF)

Keep self-evaluation claims close to live evidence, actions and the people responsible for improvement.

Part of the School Improvement workflow

03 / 03

Inspection Readiness

Bring the evidence, gaps and follow-up for inspection preparation into one accountable leadership view.

Part of the School Improvement workflow

Evidence in context

A plan that admits things

Unassigned, unscheduled, unevidenced and overdue all read as exactly that, which is what makes the rest of the plan believable.

  • Priorities with owner, schedule and review state, including when unassigned
  • Actions with dates, overdue visible
  • Evidence linked where it exists, absent where it does not

What changes when School Improvement is connected

The value of School Improvement is the route from current evidence to an accountable next step, with the people and context around the work kept visible.

A plan that shows its gaps instead of hiding them

Overdue actions that read as overdue

SEF preparation from the plan's real state

The value of a connected school

School priorities with the evidence underneath.

Connected reporting gives leaders a route from the whole-school picture to a question, a named action and its review.

Follow a connection to see what it makes possible

Relevant context, with access set by each staff member’s role and responsibilities. Staff decide the response.

  1. Attendance + Lead

    Follow the cohort behind the headline

    Move from school attendance into year groups, pupil groups and sessions. Use the detail to focus the leadership conversation and decide what needs investigating.

    Explore attendance
  2. SEND + Lead

    Review provision, delivery and the evidence of progress

    Bring SEND reporting into the improvement cycle so leaders can review provision and costs alongside recorded outcomes and the gaps still needing attention.

    Explore SEND
  3. Safeguarding + Lead

    Keep oversight appropriate to the audience

    Use safeguarding assurance and aggregated evidence for leadership oversight, while case detail stays within authorised safeguarding workflows.

    Explore safeguarding

Ask to see the improvement plan in the Demo School

A priority with its owners, actions and gaps.