Student Radar
Log in
Back to Lead

Everything included: £4.25 per pupil/year before volume discounts of 5% to 20%, £250 minimum/year, excluding VAT. See pricing

Lead / School Priorities

School improvement priorities, actions and evidence

Student Radar helps school leaders turn an agreed priority into owned actions, milestones and review dates. Measures, evidence, monitoring and CPD support later review, keeping completed work distinct from evidence that the intended outcome improved.

Request a demoWatch a product example

Leaders choose the priority and the response. Done actions, linked proof and generated progress reports do not establish improved pupil outcomes or an inspection judgement.

The register groups the fictional priority by its saved framework and area, with owner, status and review context. Fictional example.

Set the purpose, record evidence, review the next action

Give school improvement a lead, a plan and evidence to review.

Connect priorities with owners, milestones, actions, measures, evidence, monitoring and CPD, then review delivery separately from the outcomes you intended.

  1. 01

    Check the purpose and missing pieces

    Overview brings together the plan, success criteria and next review; missing lead and measures remain explicit.

  2. 02

    Refine the agreed plan deliberately

    Editing the priority retains the saved evaluation context and makes ownership and review dates available for checking.

  3. 03

    Return to the revised priority

    The fictional revised title is saved, while no active actions and Not assessed remain distinct from successful impact.

School Priorities

Check the purpose and missing pieces

Overview brings together the plan, success criteria and next review; missing lead and measures remain explicit.

Overview brings together the plan, success criteria and next review; missing lead and measures remain explicit. Fictional example.

School Priorities

Refine the agreed plan deliberately

Editing the priority retains the saved evaluation context and makes ownership and review dates available for checking.

Editing the priority retains the saved evaluation context and makes ownership and review dates available for checking. Fictional example.

School Priorities

Return to the revised priority

The fictional revised title is saved, while no active actions and Not assessed remain distinct from successful impact.

The fictional revised title is saved, while no active actions and Not assessed remain distinct from successful impact. Fictional example.

School Priorities

Keep outcomes separate from delivery

No linked measures is an explicit setup gap; action completion is not used as an invented outcome.

No linked measures is an explicit setup gap; action completion is not used as an invented outcome. Fictional example.

School Priorities

Review the selected priority on a phone

The Measures section retains the priority context and its missing-measure explanation.

The Measures section retains the priority context and its missing-measure explanation. Fictional example.

Leadership records that preserve the decision and its evidence

Leaders choose the priority and the response. Done actions, linked proof and generated progress reports do not establish improved pupil outcomes or an inspection judgement.

Improvement with a named next step

Owners, review dates and milestones make the intended change operational rather than leaving it as a plan heading.

Delivery and impact interpreted separately

Action proof and recorded measures support different review questions, with missing targets or values still explicit.

A review account connected to its sources

Evidence, observations and CPD remain linked to the priority’s saved framework context before leaders report progress.

Questions about School Priorities

Can a school priority have its own lead and milestones?

Yes. Record its purpose and lead, add dated milestones and assign the work needed to move the plan forward.

Can we link measures and evidence to review the outcome?

Yes. Priorities connect measures, evidence and observations. Review those sources separately from the percentage of actions completed.

Related help guides

See how to carry out these tasks in Student Radar, with step-by-step product help for the people using them.

The value of a connected school

School priorities with the evidence underneath.

Connected reporting gives leaders a route from the whole-school picture to a question, a named action and its review.

Lead

Context for the next step

Student Radar

Follow a connection to see what it makes possible

Relevant context, with access set by each staff member’s role and responsibilities. Staff decide the response.

  1. Attendance + Lead

    Follow the cohort behind the headline

    Move from school attendance into year groups, pupil groups and sessions. Use the detail to focus the leadership conversation and decide what needs investigating.

    Explore attendance

  2. SEND + Lead

    Review provision, delivery and the evidence of progress

    Bring SEND reporting into the improvement cycle so leaders can review provision and costs alongside recorded outcomes and the gaps still needing attention.

    Explore SEND

  3. Safeguarding + Lead

    Keep oversight appropriate to the audience

    Use safeguarding assurance and aggregated evidence for leadership oversight, while case detail stays within authorised safeguarding workflows.

    Explore safeguarding

Review the next improvement decision with your team

Connect priorities with owners, milestones, actions, measures, evidence, monitoring and CPD, then review delivery separately from the outcomes you intended. Leaders choose the priority and the response. Done actions, linked proof and generated progress reports do not establish improved pupil outcomes or an inspection judgement.

Request a demoWatch a product example