Evidence gaps with a concrete next check
Area context and cited sources help leaders decide what needs review without treating restricted records as absent.
Back to Lead
Everything included: £4.25 per pupil/year before volume discounts of 5% to 20%, £250 minimum/year, excluding VAT. See pricing
Lead / Inspection Readiness
School inspection readiness and evidence coordination
Student Radar helps leaders connect self-evaluation, improvement priorities and cited evidence in the Inspection Hub. Purposeful pupil reviews and owned inspection-day requests support preparation without predicting an inspection result or grading the school.
Leaders judge readiness and choose the response. Cited evidence, a completed request or an empty queue does not predict an inspection result or prove school improvement.
Review evidence, agree responsibility, retain the outcome
Connect inspection enquiries to reviewed evidence and owned work.
Bring self-evaluation, priority attention flags and cited evidence together, then coordinate purposeful pupil samples and inspection-day requests with owners, due times and outcomes.
01
Trace the evidence cited by an evaluation
The evidence index links the retained fictional discussion review to its applicable evaluation area.
02
Give requests an owner and due time
Inspection day lists operational work without implying an external submission or automatic pack.
03
Record the next update against the actual request
The work editor keeps request, source context, owner, school-time deadline and outcome together.
Inspection Readiness
Trace the evidence cited by an evaluation
The evidence index links the retained fictional discussion review to its applicable evaluation area.
Inspection Readiness
Give requests an owner and due time
Inspection day lists operational work without implying an external submission or automatic pack.
Inspection Readiness
Record the next update against the actual request
The work editor keeps request, source context, owner, school-time deadline and outcome together.
Inspection Readiness
Retain what was checked without overstating completion
The reopened fictional request keeps its update while remaining To do; supplying records and completing review are distinct.
Inspection Readiness
Choose a purposeful pupil enquiry
An empty sampling list offers a deliberate review rather than implying every pupil has been checked.
Inspection Readiness
Coordinate the same enquiry on a phone
The Pupil sampling section retains its work filter and explicit empty state at phone width.
A leadership account with a clear next action
Leaders judge readiness and choose the response. Cited evidence, a completed request or an empty queue does not predict an inspection result or prove school improvement.
Purposeful enquiries with responsibility
Pupil reviews and inspection requests have an owner, school-time deadline and recorded account of what happened.
Preparation coordinated through original records
Source links and owned work connect the response while specialist facts remain in their own authorised workflows.
Questions about Inspection Readiness
Can we trace inspection preparation back to cited evidence?
Yes. The hub brings evaluation areas and an evidence index together so leaders can inspect the cited sources they are permitted to open.
Can inspection-day requests have owners and due times?
Yes. Log requests, assign ownership and due times, and record the actual response or outcome.
Related help guides
See how to carry out these tasks in Student Radar, with step-by-step product help for the people using them.
The value of a connected school
School priorities with the evidence underneath.
Connected reporting gives leaders a route from the whole-school picture to a question, a named action and its review.
AttendanceSchool, cohort & session records
SENDProvision, costs & outcomes
SafeguardingAssurance & aggregated evidence
Lead
Context for the next step
Student RadarFollow a connection to see what it makes possible
Relevant context, with access set by each staff member’s role and responsibilities. Staff decide the response.
Attendance + Lead
Follow the cohort behind the headline
Move from school attendance into year groups, pupil groups and sessions. Use the detail to focus the leadership conversation and decide what needs investigating.
Explore attendanceSEND + Lead
Review provision, delivery and the evidence of progress
Bring SEND reporting into the improvement cycle so leaders can review provision and costs alongside recorded outcomes and the gaps still needing attention.
Explore SENDSafeguarding + Lead
Keep oversight appropriate to the audience
Use safeguarding assurance and aggregated evidence for leadership oversight, while case detail stays within authorised safeguarding workflows.
Explore safeguarding
Walk through the next review with your leadership team
Bring self-evaluation, priority attention flags and cited evidence together, then coordinate purposeful pupil samples and inspection-day requests with owners, due times and outcomes. Leaders judge readiness and choose the response. Cited evidence, a completed request or an empty queue does not predict an inspection result or prove school improvement.