A vision whose evidence keeps its original context
Versioned vision, current/pre-vision evidence and subject/group lenses show which question and recorded population a claim concerns.
Back to Lead
Everything included: £4.25 per pupil/year before volume discounts of 5% to 20%, £250 minimum/year, excluding VAT. See pricing
Lead / SIAMS
SIAMS self-evaluation and Christian vision evidence
Student Radar helps church school leaders connect lived examples with SIAMS questions, record self-evaluation and retain worship and wider voices. The ungraded hub supports reviewed material for an intended audience; the school’s recorded judgement is not an inspector’s decision or proof of pupils’ and adults’ flourishing.
Staff interpret the evidence and authorise what is recorded or shared. Coverage, a school working judgement or planned worship does not become an inspection grade or proof of flourishing.
Check context, record the decision, review the result
Connect the Christian vision with evidence, reflection and the next question.
Link lived examples to the SIAMS questions, retain a considered self-evaluation, record worship and wider voices, and prepare reviewed material for the intended audience.
01
Read the actual evidence and its limits
One fictional staff reflection states its limited sample and which wider voices remain unchecked.
02
Write what the evidence supports and what needs review
The working narrative separates one staff discussion from untested pupil and family perspectives.
03
Return to a retained professional reflection
The fictional narrative is retained after reopening the selected question; it does not assert an inspection judgement.
SIAMS
Read the actual evidence and its limits
One fictional staff reflection states its limited sample and which wider voices remain unchecked.
SIAMS
Write what the evidence supports and what needs review
The working narrative separates one staff discussion from untested pupil and family perspectives.
SIAMS
Return to a retained professional reflection
The fictional narrative is retained after reopening the selected question; it does not assert an inspection judgement.
SIAMS
Investigate helping and hindering without inventing outcomes
The diagnostic panel reads the recorded evidence separately from an inspection grade or automatic assigned action.
SIAMS
Preserve the vision’s recorded version context
Fictional vision history keeps its values and review date distinct from a later inspection decision.
SIAMS
Read the same recorded history on a phone
The selected history remains readable at phone width.
A clear record for the responsible team
Staff interpret the evidence and authorise what is recorded or shared. Coverage, a school working judgement or planned worship does not become an inspection grade or proof of flourishing.
A reflection that retains uncertainty
Narrative, strengths, priorities and captured measures distinguish observations from interpretation and unchecked voices.
A prepared conversation with the right audience
Worship/monitoring/voice records and explicit export/adviser choices support a reviewed discussion without claiming delivery or an external judgement.
Questions about SIAMS
Can we connect evidence to the SIAMS inspection questions?
Yes. Link lived examples to the questions and review the evidence alongside the school’s considered self-evaluation.
Can we retain worship records and wider voices?
Yes. The hub includes worship and wider records to support review. Staff decide what that evidence establishes rather than infer an inspection judgement.
Related help guides
See how to carry out these tasks in Student Radar, with step-by-step product help for the people using them.
The value of a connected school
School priorities with the evidence underneath.
Connected reporting gives leaders a route from the whole-school picture to a question, a named action and its review.
AttendanceSchool, cohort & session records
SENDProvision, costs & outcomes
SafeguardingAssurance & aggregated evidence
Lead
Context for the next step
Student RadarFollow a connection to see what it makes possible
Relevant context, with access set by each staff member’s role and responsibilities. Staff decide the response.
Attendance + Lead
Follow the cohort behind the headline
Move from school attendance into year groups, pupil groups and sessions. Use the detail to focus the leadership conversation and decide what needs investigating.
Explore attendanceSEND + Lead
Review provision, delivery and the evidence of progress
Bring SEND reporting into the improvement cycle so leaders can review provision and costs alongside recorded outcomes and the gaps still needing attention.
Explore SENDSafeguarding + Lead
Keep oversight appropriate to the audience
Use safeguarding assurance and aggregated evidence for leadership oversight, while case detail stays within authorised safeguarding workflows.
Explore safeguarding
Agree the next step with the responsible staff
Link lived examples to the SIAMS questions, retain a considered self-evaluation, record worship and wider voices, and prepare reviewed material for the intended audience. Staff interpret the evidence and authorise what is recorded or shared. Coverage, a school working judgement or planned worship does not become an inspection grade or proof of flourishing.