Student Radar
Log in
Back to Lead

Everything included: £4.25 per pupil/year before volume discounts of 5% to 20%, £250 minimum/year, excluding VAT. See pricing

Lead / Monitoring & QA

School monitoring, quality assurance and follow-up

Student Radar helps school leaders plan focused monitoring, record observations and agree findings with owned next steps. Activities and longer monitoring cycles connect to evidence and review dates, while action completion stays distinct from demonstrated impact.

Request a demoWatch a product example

Staff interpret evidence and authorise the response. Activity/cycle completion, a rating or a created follow-up does not prove improved teaching or pupil outcomes.

The fictional register identifies a private draft learning walk, planned review and bounded sample. Fictional example.

Choose the enquiry, inspect evidence, agree the next action

Make monitoring a purposeful enquiry with evidence and a reviewed response.

Plan activities and monitoring cycles, record observations and findings, share deliberately and connect agreed next steps to owned work, review time and evidence.

  1. 01

    Plan a question staff can actually investigate

    The activity keeps its purpose, subjects/areas, timing and sampling approach together.

  2. 02

    Capture observation before interpretation

    The fictional note separates what four pupils were observed doing from the wider cohort and later review still unchecked.

  3. 03

    Return to the retained evidence revision

    The saved fictional note is reopened at revision 2 while the activity remains a private draft.

Monitoring & QA

Plan a question staff can actually investigate

The activity keeps its purpose, subjects/areas, timing and sampling approach together.

The activity keeps its purpose, subjects/areas, timing and sampling approach together. Fictional example.

Monitoring & QA

Capture observation before interpretation

The fictional note separates what four pupils were observed doing from the wider cohort and later review still unchecked.

The fictional note separates what four pupils were observed doing from the wider cohort and later review still unchecked. Fictional example.

Monitoring & QA

Return to the retained evidence revision

The saved fictional note is reopened at revision 2 while the activity remains a private draft.

The saved fictional note is reopened at revision 2 while the activity remains a private draft. Fictional example.

Monitoring & QA

Make the interpretation and review deliberate

Strengths, development and next steps await a professional judgement rather than being calculated from the note count.

Strengths, development and next steps await a professional judgement rather than being calculated from the note count. Fictional example.

Monitoring & QA

Reuse questions while adapting the enquiry

The template library offers starting prompts and guidance, not pre-recorded findings or guaranteed impact.

The template library offers starting prompts and guidance, not pre-recorded findings or guaranteed impact. Fictional example.

Monitoring & QA

Check the available templates on a phone

The same monitoring workspace retains its selected section at phone width.

The same monitoring workspace retains its selected section at phone width. Fictional example.

A recorded review with its meaning intact

Staff interpret evidence and authorise the response. Activity/cycle completion, a rating or a created follow-up does not prove improved teaching or pupil outcomes.

An enquiry with a proportionate plan

Question, methods, sample and review time give evidence collection a clear purpose.

A retained evidence and interpretation trail

Saved observations, explicit limits and reviewed findings preserve what was seen separately from what staff concluded.

A response with ownership and review

Assigned actions, Calendar reviews and deliberate SEF contribution connect findings without treating completion as impact.

Questions about Monitoring & QA

Can we plan both individual activities and longer monitoring cycles?

Yes. Monitoring & QA supports focused activities and monitoring areas for a longer cycle, with each enquiry tied to its evidence and purpose.

Can agreed findings become owned follow-up?

Yes. Give findings a next action and review time, then return to the evidence when recording what happened later.

Related help guides

See how to carry out these tasks in Student Radar, with step-by-step product help for the people using them.

The value of a connected school

School priorities with the evidence underneath.

Connected reporting gives leaders a route from the whole-school picture to a question, a named action and its review.

Lead

Context for the next step

Student Radar

Follow a connection to see what it makes possible

Relevant context, with access set by each staff member’s role and responsibilities. Staff decide the response.

  1. Attendance + Lead

    Follow the cohort behind the headline

    Move from school attendance into year groups, pupil groups and sessions. Use the detail to focus the leadership conversation and decide what needs investigating.

    Explore attendance

  2. SEND + Lead

    Review provision, delivery and the evidence of progress

    Bring SEND reporting into the improvement cycle so leaders can review provision and costs alongside recorded outcomes and the gaps still needing attention.

    Explore SEND

  3. Safeguarding + Lead

    Keep oversight appropriate to the audience

    Use safeguarding assurance and aggregated evidence for leadership oversight, while case detail stays within authorised safeguarding workflows.

    Explore safeguarding

Review the next question with your leadership team

Plan activities and monitoring cycles, record observations and findings, share deliberately and connect agreed next steps to owned work, review time and evidence. Staff interpret evidence and authorise the response. Activity/cycle completion, a rating or a created follow-up does not prove improved teaching or pupil outcomes.

Request a demoWatch a product example